- PREACHER RERUN OF DIRTY LITTLESECRETS HOW TO
- PREACHER RERUN OF DIRTY LITTLESECRETS SERIES
- PREACHER RERUN OF DIRTY LITTLESECRETS TV
DVD of the seven episode series that is about to air on PBS. Some friends value HD screens for watching current shows like the Brit costume drama Downton Abbey - the clothes, jewellery, and Edwardian décor demand a crisp picture, and for $20 Amazon already sells the Season 2 U.K.
PREACHER RERUN OF DIRTY LITTLESECRETS TV
Although it features older TV series, its selection of documentaries hooked many a reporter. Netflix is the big favourite for $8 a month, and it even comes on mobile apps. They've replaced it with a host of a la carte services at about half the price. Still it came as something of a shock to learn that almost no one I know watched old-fashioned TV that requires you to buy multiple tiers of bad programming in order to get access to the content you really want. Incidentally, does anyone really need to ask why no one is watching CBC drama when they deliver writing and acting this amateur? Have they not heard of Mad Men? There the hilariously bad embedded ads for cars and tea sound just like a 1970s detergent commercial. The rest of us have been skipping the ads for about 30 years, which has led to astoundingly inept product placement within TV shows, and more tuning-out on series like CBC's current swillfest, Being Erica. (And let that be a lesson to you about the hazards of not embracing technology.) I'm guessing they're the ones who never mastered their VCRs, which set them on a death spiral of technophobia that now leaves them to watch whatever accommodates their bedtime. Hit shows like Dancing with the Stars are favoured by people 60ish. was 50, while the median age of Americans was 38. By 2008, the median age of live-TV watchers in the U.S. Generally, only children and the infirm park themselves in front of the box and indiscriminately consume whatever the cable gods deem suitable.
PREACHER RERUN OF DIRTY LITTLESECRETS HOW TO
And it turns out I'm not alone.īroadcasters have seen this coming ever since we figured out how to program our VCRs, sometime in the 1980s, and learned that TV-on-demand is divine. Worse, it forces us to fund content we find objectionable. The way television is delivered didn't reflect how I lived, what I wanted to watch, or what the technology can do for us. And view only about five TV shows a year in full, so I wait for the reviews before I commit. I didn't want an episode weekly I wanted to view the series when I had time. I had other issues with multi-channel entertainment packages but the clincher was that I'd been watching The Wire on DVD and found that it was by far the best way to see sophisticated shows that are structured like novels, with intricate plots and character development. But as I said to my editor when I gave up the TV gig: You can't pay me enough to watch this crap why would I pay for the privilege? I agreed it was clearly my fault for not wanting what they deliver (very effectively). (What was she: an America's Next Top Model fan?) Finally she took my point about there being nothing worth my time and exploded in frustration: "But THAT is not our fault!" I kept repeating that I was canceling my cable because, essentially, there were 60 channels and nothing on. The very pleasant woman seemed to think I was punishing them for something and kept asking me to explain myself. That led to one of those convoluted conversations that can only happen with cogs in a bureaucratic wheel. "Buffy the Vampire Slayer ended and that's all I want to watch," I confessed. When they asked why I was leaving I drew on the classic break-up speech and assured them it wasn't them, it was me. Not long thereafter I called my TV content provider who, while absurdly overpriced and indifferent to my tastes, had always been reliable.
It was all over for me the day a release announcing the latest cycle of Survivor arrived and I burst into tears at the thought of being tortured through another celebration of psychopaths and stupidity. I stopped watching TV about six years ago, after a stint as a television critic put me off the whole wretched medium. So why buy a device designed specifically to deliver shows we don't want when there are already 2.8 TVs hanging around the average household? Throw in the boom in tablets, and the old-fashioned TV has gone from being the electronic fireplace to just another white elephant.īut I suspect there's another reason for the 50 per cent drop in boob-tube prices: television sucks. The news that TV prices have dropped low enough to force some makers out of the market will come as a surprise to no one who caught the sales flyers.Įconomic analysts explain it by pointing to everything from the strong yen frustrating Japanese manufacturers like Sony and Panasonic, to the recession, to increasingly savvy consumers realizing that if they just wait six months the price for the latest gizmo will drop.
0 kommentar(er)
